Carriers have standardized around a real checklist of controls — and businesses that can't show them are seeing non-renewals, not just higher premiums.
A few years ago, a cyber insurance application was mostly a self-reported questionnaire. That era is over. Carriers now ask for evidence: screenshots, policy documents, configuration exports. Businesses that can't produce it are increasingly seeing non-renewals or sharply reduced coverage, not just a higher quote.
The gap between businesses that can show these controls and those that can't is showing up directly in premiums and coverage. One documented case involved a business that fixed four specific gaps in its control set before renewal and saw only a 4% premium increase year-over-year. A comparable business that couldn't demonstrate the same controls was non-renewed outright. Its replacement coverage cost 47% more, with reduced ransomware sub-limits on top of the higher price.
It's rarely one glaring gap. It's more often a handful of controls that were “mostly” in place: MFA everywhere except one legacy system, backups that run nightly but haven't had a real restore test in over a year, an incident response plan that exists as a document nobody's walked through. Insurers increasingly ask for proof, and “mostly” doesn't hold up to a documentation request.
This is a large part of what our Compliance & Insurance Readiness work covers: going through your environment against what carriers are asking for now, before that gap shows up on a renewal application instead of in a conversation with us first.
Tell us what's going on and we'll quote a flat monthly number. No obligation.